Moses' symal: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.nlp.moses.user/11544
Best Regards, Ergun Ergun Biçici, CNGL, School of Computing, DCU, www.cngl.ie http://www.computing.dcu.ie/~ebicici/ On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Jeroen Vermeulen < j...@precisiontranslationtools.com> wrote: > The symal source code is duplicated between the moses-smt and mgiza > repositories. Does it make sense to have both? They're quietly > diverging, which is probably a bad thing. > > Here's the differences that I can see: > * I modernized the code in moses-smt. Big diff, no functional change. > * The moses-smt version supports longer source and target strings. > * The mgiza version has what looks like some extra debug output. > * The moses-smt version avoids non-portable use of /dev/stdout. > * One builds through bjam, the other through cmake. > > Could we perhaps just delete the mgiza one, and tell people to use the > one from moses instead? > > > Jeroen > _______________________________________________ > Moses-support mailing list > Moses-support@mit.edu > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support >
_______________________________________________ Moses-support mailing list Moses-support@mit.edu http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support
