Moses' symal:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.nlp.moses.user/11544


Best Regards,
Ergun

Ergun Biçici, CNGL, School of Computing, DCU, www.cngl.ie
http://www.computing.dcu.ie/~ebicici/


On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Jeroen Vermeulen <
j...@precisiontranslationtools.com> wrote:

> The symal source code is duplicated between the moses-smt and mgiza
> repositories.  Does it make sense to have both?  They're quietly
> diverging, which is probably a bad thing.
>
> Here's the differences that I can see:
>  * I modernized the code in moses-smt.  Big diff, no functional change.
>  * The moses-smt version supports longer source and target strings.
>  * The mgiza version has what looks like some extra debug output.
>  * The moses-smt version avoids non-portable use of /dev/stdout.
>  * One builds through bjam, the other through cmake.
>
> Could we perhaps just delete the mgiza one, and tell people to use the
> one from moses instead?
>
>
> Jeroen
> _______________________________________________
> Moses-support mailing list
> Moses-support@mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support
>
_______________________________________________
Moses-support mailing list
Moses-support@mit.edu
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support

Reply via email to