Hi Hieu, First a compile: ./bjam --max-kenlm-order=10 --git --prefix=/path/moses/mosesdecoder/ --with-giza=/path/mgiza/mgizapp/inst/ --with-xmlrpc-c=/path/moses/mosesdecoder/opt/ --with-boost=/path/moses/mosesdecoder/opt/ --with-cmph=/path/moses/mosesdecoder/opt/ -j 20
then, a copy: cp mgiza/mgizapp/inst/bin/* moses/mosesdecoder/instdir/bin/ cp mgiza/mgizapp/inst/lib/* moses/mosesdecoder/instdir/lib/ cp mgiza/mgizapp/inst/scripts/* moses/mosesdecoder/instdir/bin/ With which another copy appears to be needed to use Moses' symal: cp moses/mosesdecoder/symal/bin/gcc-4.8/release/link-static/threading-multi/symal moses/mosesdecoder/bin/symal Therefore, even if the path to mgiza is provided (--with-giza=/path/mgiza/m gizapp/inst/), some copying and updated appear to be needed (see also http://www.statmt.org/moses/?n=Moses.ExternalTools#ntoc3). *Best Regards,* Ergun Ergun Biçici DFKI Projektbüro Berlin On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 3:34 PM, Hieu Hoang <hieuho...@gmail.com> wrote: > What the exact commands u used to compile moses and mgiza? I'm pretty sure > they don't overwrite each other unless you ask them too. They're > independent projects > On 10 Jan 2016 14:07, "Ergun Bicici" <ergun.bic...@dfki.de> wrote: > >> >> Hi, >> >> I compiled another Moses instance and symal appears to be copied from >> mgiza still to mosesdecoder/bin/. >> >> >> *Best Regards,* >> Ergun >> >> Ergun Biçici >> DFKI Projektbüro Berlin >> >> >> On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 2:47 PM, Ergun Bicici < >> ergun.bic...@computing.dcu.ie> wrote: >> >>> >>> Moses' symal: >>> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.nlp.moses.user/11544 >>> >>> >>> Best Regards, >>> Ergun >>> >>> Ergun Biçici, CNGL, School of Computing, DCU, www.cngl.ie >>> http://www.computing.dcu.ie/~ebicici/ >>> >>> >>> On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Jeroen Vermeulen < >>> j...@precisiontranslationtools.com> wrote: >>> >>>> The symal source code is duplicated between the moses-smt and mgiza >>>> repositories. Does it make sense to have both? They're quietly >>>> diverging, which is probably a bad thing. >>>> >>>> Here's the differences that I can see: >>>> * I modernized the code in moses-smt. Big diff, no functional change. >>>> * The moses-smt version supports longer source and target strings. >>>> * The mgiza version has what looks like some extra debug output. >>>> * The moses-smt version avoids non-portable use of /dev/stdout. >>>> * One builds through bjam, the other through cmake. >>>> >>>> Could we perhaps just delete the mgiza one, and tell people to use the >>>> one from moses instead? >>>> >>>> >>>> Jeroen >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Moses-support mailing list >>>> Moses-support@mit.edu >>>> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support >>>> >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Moses-support mailing list >> Moses-support@mit.edu >> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support >> >>
_______________________________________________ Moses-support mailing list Moses-support@mit.edu http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support
