I can really recommend Eman to people interested in spawning dozens of similar experiments, by deriving new variations from older ones. Eman will take care of reusing reusable bits and creating new bits as needed. So e.g. corpus preprocessing, bpe etc. could be reused when you want to try new training parameters.
The main reason for my little hesitation is that there has been no cleanup and release of Eman and friends for quite a while. We are actively using it, but such a polish would be better before trying to get fresh publicity. Please have a look at the old eman PBML paper and if you think this would match the intended use for your aimed user group, it would make a great incentive for us to do this cleanup. Thanks, O. 26. listopadu 2017 14:31:40 SEČ, Marcin Junczys-Dowmunt <junc...@amu.edu.pl> napsal: >Hi Ondrej, >you do not seem confident enough to recommend Eman :) > >I now took another look at duct tape. That does not look too bad, >basically Make with multi-targets and easier reuse of existing recipes >(which is a nightmare in GNU make). >Is anyone still using duct tape, commit dates are from two years ago? > >W dniu 26.11.2017 o 13:30, Ondrej Bojar pisze: >> Hi, Marcin. >> >> I am afraid you are correct. I have my Eman and a couple of my >students are using it (we have Neural Monkey, Nematus, t2t and probably >already also Marian in), but it has a rather steep learning curve and >it generally has other bells and whistles that what someone with data >and desire for a single model would ask for. >> >> There were also Makefiles for Moses, but I never tried those. >> >> And Neural Monkey has most of the pre-processing and evaluation in >itself. >> >> I guess that commented oneliner snippets are the best thing you can >do. >> >> Cheers, O. >> >> >> 26. listopadu 2017 10:41:16 SEČ, Marcin Junczys-Dowmunt ><junc...@amu.edu.pl> napsal: >>> Hi list, >>> >>> I am preparing a couple of usage example for my NMT toolkit and got >>> hung >>> up on all the preprocessing and other evil stuff. I am wondering is >>> there now anything decent around for doing preprocessing, running >>> experiments and evaluation? Or is the best thing still GNU make >(isn't >>> that embarrassing)? >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Marcin >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Moses-support mailing list >>> Moses-support@mit.edu >>> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support >> -- Ondrej Bojar (mailto:o...@cuni.cz / bo...@ufal.mff.cuni.cz) http://www.cuni.cz/~obo _______________________________________________ Moses-support mailing list Moses-support@mit.edu http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support
