Thanks Matt for the promotion! I’ve been using this ducttape workflow for about 6 months and is pretty happy with it. That’s why I thought it’s time to give it a bigger audience.
I agree ducttape is a bit under-maintained at this moment (the core code is left there for ~4 years without any concrete update). But another side of the fact is that I know some folks who is still using it actively, and that makes me believe that the core functionality of ducttape is pretty stable. So as long as I’m not in the situation of defining super-fancy workflows, I guess I’m pretty comfortable with using ducttape. Shuoyang > On Nov 26, 2017, at 9:19 AM, Marcin Junczys-Dowmunt <junc...@amu.edu.pl> > wrote: > > This looks good. > OK, I guess ducttape it is. > > W dniu 26.11.2017 o 14:56, Matt Post pisze: >> Shuoyang Ding put this together recently: >> >> https://github.com/shuoyangd/tape4nmt >> >> matt >> >> >>> On Nov 26, 2017, at 2:31 PM, Marcin Junczys-Dowmunt <junc...@amu.edu.pl> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Ondrej, >>> you do not seem confident enough to recommend Eman :) >>> >>> I now took another look at duct tape. That does not look too bad, >>> basically Make with multi-targets and easier reuse of existing recipes >>> (which is a nightmare in GNU make). >>> Is anyone still using duct tape, commit dates are from two years ago? >>> >>> W dniu 26.11.2017 o 13:30, Ondrej Bojar pisze: >>>> Hi, Marcin. >>>> >>>> I am afraid you are correct. I have my Eman and a couple of my students >>>> are using it (we have Neural Monkey, Nematus, t2t and probably already >>>> also Marian in), but it has a rather steep learning curve and it generally >>>> has other bells and whistles that what someone with data and desire for a >>>> single model would ask for. >>>> >>>> There were also Makefiles for Moses, but I never tried those. >>>> >>>> And Neural Monkey has most of the pre-processing and evaluation in itself. >>>> >>>> I guess that commented oneliner snippets are the best thing you can do. >>>> >>>> Cheers, O. >>>> >>>> >>>> 26. listopadu 2017 10:41:16 SEČ, Marcin Junczys-Dowmunt >>>> <junc...@amu.edu.pl> napsal: >>>>> Hi list, >>>>> >>>>> I am preparing a couple of usage example for my NMT toolkit and got >>>>> hung >>>>> up on all the preprocessing and other evil stuff. I am wondering is >>>>> there now anything decent around for doing preprocessing, running >>>>> experiments and evaluation? Or is the best thing still GNU make (isn't >>>>> that embarrassing)? >>>>> >>>>> Best, >>>>> >>>>> Marcin >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Moses-support mailing list >>>>> Moses-support@mit.edu >>>>> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Moses-support mailing list >>> Moses-support@mit.edu >>> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support > > > > _______________________________________________ > Moses-support mailing list > Moses-support@mit.edu > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support _______________________________________________ Moses-support mailing list Moses-support@mit.edu http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support
