To any who cares to respond....I'm wondering why it's acceptable and praised to 
post locations
of an out of range bird that may or may not be stressed due to being in a 
possibly challenging 
climate, (Tropical Kingbird in Duluth for example), but worriesome to post 
locations of owls?
Is it "ethical" to support increased carbon footprints being left all over the 
state so a person 
can pad their state list?  I don't know, but... this seems like some type of 
double standard to me.  
I do not have an issue with anyone posting locations of rarities or owls, but 
the seemingly 
double standard perplexes me...?  
Regards and feedback appreciated,
Shawn Zierman.

----
Join or Leave mou-net: http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=mou-net
Archives: http://lists.umn.edu/archives/mou-net.html

Reply via email to