fantasai wrote:
> Gervase Markham wrote:
>
>>>Can you give me a more solid basis for extrapolating that?
>>>A rule, maybe? Those three are as good as getting 1, 2, 4
>>>for a number sequence.
>>>
>>Here are some more:
>>
>>...
>>
>>I'm sure you can find the relevant current web pages, if they exist
>>(which they do for most of the technologies on this list.)
>>
>
> Ah, so you've basically taken the all Mozilla's software development
> projects from http://mozilla.org/projects/ and put them in /dev/tech.
>
> So, extending the list, I add
>
> browser
no
> editor
no
> irc
no
> p3p
yes
> vixen
no
> xpconnect
yes
> xpnet
what is that
All those I labeled with a no are "products" which we may want to
separate from Mozilla in the future. /dev/tech, as I see it, and as we
discussed it before, are the raw technologies developed in Mozilla. The
browser is not a technology, it makes uses of a set of technology, same
goes for editor and chatzilla and vixen. The P3P however is a technology
in itself, same goes for xpconnect, and all those that Gerv mentioned.
The ones you mention below should indeed not appear in /dev/tech
Bugzilla and Bonsai should be with LXR with the other webtools.
-Fabian.
>
> but not
>
> bugzilla
> i18n
> performance
> bonsai
>
> Am I on the right track?
>
