fantasai wrote: >... > fantasai wrote: > > > > Ian Hickson wrote: >... > > > Avoid unnecessary abbreviations in URIs, this should be > > > evangelism/. > > > > ok. Should /dev also be expanded? > > No, it should not. It's easier to type, and "dev" is a very > common, well known abbreviation. Were it to expand, it could > be /develop, /developer, or /development--it's easier to > remember /dev. And on top of that, the abbreviation is also > valid in French. :) By the same logic, /contribute/ should be /contrib/. It's easier to type, and `contrib' is a very common, well-known abbreviation (used by geeky FTP servers worldwide). Were it to expand, it could be /contribute/, /contributor/, or /contribution/ ... Also by the same logic, <http://mozilla.org/> should be changed to <http://moz.org/>. It's easier to type, and `Moz' is a very common, well-known abbreviation ... -- M. `mpt' T., M. UI D. c. d. a. t. <http://m.o/>
- Re: www.mozilla.org URI structure fantasai
- Re: www.mozilla.org URI structure Gervase Markham
- Re: www.mozilla.org URI structure fantasai
- Re: www.mozilla.org URI structure Gervase Markham
- Re: www.mozilla.org URI structure fantasai
- Re: www.mozilla.org URI structure Fabian Guisset
- Re: www.mozilla.org URI structure fantasai
- Re: www.mozilla.org URI structure Matthew Thomas
- Re: www.mozilla.org URI structure fantasai
- Re: www.mozilla.org URI structure Matthew Thomas
- Re: www.mozilla.org URI structure Matthew Thomas
- Re: www.mozilla.org URI structure Fabian Guisset
- Re: www.mozilla.org URI structure Matthew Thomas
- Re: www.mozilla.org URI structure fantasai
- Re: www.mozilla.org URI structure Matthew Thomas
- Re: www.mozilla.org URI structure Luke
- Re: www.mozilla.org URI structure fantasai
- Re: www.mozilla.org URI structure Gervase Markham
- Re: www.mozilla.org URI structure Matthew Thomas
- Re: www.mozilla.org URI structure Gervase Markham
- Re: www.mozilla.org URI structure Fabian Guisset
