Fabian Guisset wrote: > > fantasai wrote: > > > > xpnet > what is that http://mozilla.org/projects/xpnet/ > All those I labeled with a no are "products" which we may want to > separate from Mozilla in the future. Why aren't XSLT and XPCOM considered "products"? http://mozilla.org/projects/xslt/ http://mozilla.org/projects/xpcom/ > /dev/tech, as I see it, and as we discussed it before, are the raw > technologies developed in Mozilla. The browser is not a technology, > it makes uses of a set of technology, same goes for editor and > chatzilla and vixen. By definition, all software is technology. What makes editor so different from, say, layout that you don't consider it a "technology"? What is your definition of "technology"? > Bugzilla and Bonsai should be with LXR with the other webtools. LXR is not developed by Mozilla.[1] That point aside, are you proposing a /dev/webtools directory? [1] http://lxr.mozilla.org/
- Re: www.mozilla.org URI structure l337hx0r
- Re: www.mozilla.org URI structure Gervase Markham
- Re: www.mozilla.org URI structure Henri Sivonen
- Re: www.mozilla.org URI structure Gervase Markham
- Re: www.mozilla.org URI structure fantasai
- Re: www.mozilla.org URI structure Gervase Markham
- Re: www.mozilla.org URI structure fantasai
- Re: www.mozilla.org URI structure Gervase Markham
- Re: www.mozilla.org URI structure fantasai
- Re: www.mozilla.org URI structure Fabian Guisset
- Re: www.mozilla.org URI structure fantasai
- Re: www.mozilla.org URI structure Matthew Thomas
- Re: www.mozilla.org URI structure fantasai
- Re: www.mozilla.org URI structure Matthew Thomas
- Re: www.mozilla.org URI structure Matthew Thomas
- Re: www.mozilla.org URI structure Fabian Guisset
- Re: www.mozilla.org URI structure Matthew Thomas
- Re: www.mozilla.org URI structure fantasai
- Re: www.mozilla.org URI structure Matthew Thomas
- Re: www.mozilla.org URI structure Luke
- Re: www.mozilla.org URI structure fantasai
