> Okay, I've filed bug 157668 for this. I proposed two keywords (hope you > don't mind), one for "docnotes", when someone thinks there's something > worthy of doc'ing, and "docnotes+", for when we've made the appropriate > documentation note.
This is an unusual use of the "+" notation, which normally denotes some sort of approval rather than a task completed. I would prefer some other distinguisher be used. Also, why "docnotes"? It won't necessarily involve writing notes. Why not "documentation" or "docwanted" (by analogy with qawanted)? Gerv
