Re: [POLL] Mac Embedding: Where Should We Focus?

[Henri Sivonen]

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Alex Wolaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:

> > (5) MacOSX only, Carbon Mach-o with gcc/make

> Number 5.  If you're going to go for a Mac OS X-only build, then you might
> as well use the free tools.  Also, Mach-O is a huge requirement for the
> Q.BATi Project, of which I am a part.

Does that comment mean that Q.BATi is going to be Carbon-based after 
all? I thought Q.BATi was going to be Cocoa-based.

BTW, what is the actual implementation status of Q.BATi? The Q.BATi 
discussions seem to be about various alternative UI visions.

-- 
Henri Sivonen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.clinet.fi/~henris/