In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Alex Wolaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:

> Well, Q.BATi is going to be Cocoa, and this is the reason we must have 
> the Mach-O port.

Why are you then voting for a *Carbon* Mach-O port (#5 on Pinkerton's 
list) instead of a *Cocoa* Mach-O port?

-- 
Henri Sivonen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.clinet.fi/~henris/

Reply via email to