In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Scott I. Remick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Instead, the problem should be addressed in the obvious way: educate >people that IE is not standards-compliant and has no place as a litmus >test for valid code. Okay, well let me know when you're done with your reeducation program. -- Name: Dave Huang | Mammal, mammal / their names are called / INet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | they raise a paw / the bat, the cat / FurryMUCK: Dahan | dolphin and dog / koala bear and hog -- TMBG Dahan: Hani G Y+C 25 Y++ L+++ W- C++ T++ A+ E+ S++ V++ F- Q+++ P+ B+ PA+ PL++
- Re: Mozilla's rendering of slightly buggy HTML Christopher Jahn
- Re: Mozilla's rendering of slightly buggy HTML Christopher Jahn
- Re: Mozilla's rendering of slightly buggy HTML Dave Huang
- Re: Mozilla's rendering of slightly buggy HTML Christopher Jahn
- Re: Mozilla's rendering of slightly buggy HTML Matthew Cruickshank
- Re: Mozilla's rendering of slightly buggy HTML Jason Bassford
- Re: Mozilla's rendering of slightly buggy HTML David Gerard
- Re: Mozilla's rendering of slightly buggy HTML Chuck Simmons
- Re: Mozilla's rendering of slightly buggy HTML Matthew Cruickshank
- Re: Mozilla's rendering of slightly buggy HTML Scott I. Remick
- Re: Mozilla's rendering of slightly buggy HTML Scott I. Remick
- Re: Mozilla's rendering of slightly buggy HTML Matthew Cruickshank