It's been under review for more than a year now, hasn't it? There's a reason lawyers are filthy rich, I guess.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mike Geiger) wrote: > > > > > >>The problem is legal, in the sense of how the license affects theimages > >>in the releases. The matter is currently under review by some licensing > >>attorneys, so please, can we just let this play itself out? > >> > If this is the case - where did the current artwork come from? And if > people can write code that falls under the various licenses... why can't > a few images & icons? (This isn't a hostile question, I'd honestly like > to know why this is such a big deal that doesn't apply to the code.) > > Also - how do other open source projects to it? The Apache Feather? BSD > Daemon.....? > > <Mike > >
