Nobody Special wrote: You might want to change your name to a real one or you won't be taken seriously in here.
> Chris Nelson wrote: >> That sounds like a bullshit argument. Logically, it's utter crap. Come >> up with something better. > Are you an idiot, or just acting like one? Frankly, I find the "stand > by Mozilla, right OR WRONG" sentiment to be the *real* bullshit around > here. People care about performance. From a browser perspective, > performance is largely judged by the "snap" in the user > interface/experience. Other than entering a URL or clicking a link, the > *MOST* commonly utilised functions are "back" and "forward." Face it, > Mozilla just can't cut it for people that actually value their time. Apparently, you're missing that Mozilla is not an end-user browser. So logically, market share of Mozilla itself is nice, but doesn't matter. What does matter is market share of mozilla-based products like K-Meleon, Galeon and Netscape. Regards, Sören Kuklau -- This post written in MozillaNews by Sören Kuklau (Chucker). E-mail me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
