DeMoN LaG wrote: > > Jason Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 02 Feb 2002: > > > applications to undermine their system? They have created their own > > IM network, and I think that they have the right to ask users to > > use the AOL software. I don't think it's anti-competitive. > > I agree entirely. I think they could strike a deal with some client > makers like Trillian, and say "Hey, you guys can freeload, but you can't > give people the software for free and not have ads in it and so we get > no money and higher operating costs on it". Either Trillian's makers > have to pay $xxx per month or something as a "licensing fee", or they > have to run ads for AOL in their software, like AOL has in it's software
Christ, this planet is populated with nothing but dumbasses I swear. For whatever reason, you pay for AOL's "service". Ok, fine. So you then think you should have ads pumped at you? You're paying for an ad-pump service? Lambs to the fricken slaughter. Why don't you lobby congress that you want your taxes raised too while you're at it?
