"Bundy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in gSp78.83089$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:gSp78.83089$[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 04 Feb 2002:
> Take a look at all the things that Opera can do with far less code > and a much faster browser. That is the approach Mozilla should > take, speed not bells. If Opera were like 3 times faster than Mozilla, I could see your point. But it's not. On my systems, Mozilla is not perceptably slower than NC 4.x or Opera (this is on Win 2k and Linux). On Win 2k, Mozilla is not perceptably slower than IE. There are some minor exceptions, stuff like DHTML performance, but those are being addressed. Opera is a tiny bit faster, and has almost none of the features of Mozilla. No themes. Nothing like Mozilla's mail/news client. Composer, integrated IRC chat, Javascript and DOM debuggers, not to mention top of the line standards complience. Opera is a good light browser. Comparing it to Mozilla though is like saying one TV is better than another because it turns on faster, not including that one is a big screen with 5.1 surround sound and all the bells and whistles and the other is a 13" meant for hanging in the kitchen -- ICQ: N/A (temporarily) AIM: FlyersR1 9 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ = m
