Jonas Jørgensen wrote: > > Sören Kuklau wrote: > > >> I don't understand what you mean. Why is it worse for a woman to see a > >> spam message than for a man? > > > > Two words: Porn mail. This is usually directed men. Women might consider > > it quite "disturbing", and I could understand that. > > Some women find porn mail offending, some women don't. The same applies > to men. But Phillip suggested that it is, for some reason, worse for a > woman who finds porn mail offending to see a porn mail than it is for a > man who finds porn mail offending,
- which it is - > and that just strikes me as > incredibly 19th-century-like. And we know that those 19th-century folks got every single thing wrong, and that women and children should be last, and that up is down, etc etc etc. > As Kryptolus said, "Drop the 'manly' act. Wimpify, huh? No thanks. You go ahead. > This is how opression of women worked in the first place.". > How did the oppression of men that we have now get started? > /Jonas
