Peter Lairo wrote: >>> That is not the reason. The reason is more likely that they are afraid >>> that their culture cannot survive when a better culture (human rights, >>> democracy, freedom of speech - all rooted in LAW) keeps flaunting it's >>> benefits. >> >> What are you saying? Islam is a bad, undemocratic culture? > > Name *one* democratic islamic country.
Don't recall any right now. But the fact that there is a lot of islamic countries which aren't democratic does certanly NOT mean that Islam is in itself bad or anti-democratic. There are plenty of undemocratic christian countries as well. >> You are >> starting to sound like a racist. I'm sorry I have to say so, but you are. > > Islam is not a race. I don't think the arabs are a race either (but I'm > not sure). Having a very critical view of a culture doesn't make one a > racist. Correct -- Islam is a religion, not a race. So what do you call it, then? A religionist? >> (And for the record: I'm not a Muslim. I'm not a Jew, either.) > > I didn't think you were. There are far fewer muslims ans Jews in Denmark > than in the US and in Germany. Puts you in a better position to judge, > doesn't it? I didn't think so! ;) What is your problem with muslims? Why does it make such a big difference to you whether people pray to the christian God or to Allah? /Jonas -- All religions suck. Mozilla is your only true god.
