And it came to pass that Ben Bucksch wrote:
> Christopher Jahn wrote:
>
>>Mail was completely re-written after 6.0
>>
> What?
It was. N6.0 was two years ago. Surely you remember that Mail
underwent a huge re-write a few months later? So it would work
at something other than a glacial pace? And sort properly?
>
>>Try this:
>>
> Before you do *anything*, do a backup, as always.
>
> Anyways, I don't understand the problem. If the old mail
> appears at all in 6.2, why not leave it there or copy it
> (using Mailnews) whereever you want?
I think he just wants it to appear as it was without having to
re-invent the wheel, and I don't blame him. And it OUGHT to,
don't know why it isn't.
--
}:-) Christopher Jahn
{:-( Dionysian Reveler
The two most common things in the universe are hydrogen and
stupidity.
To reply: xjahnATyahooDOTcom
