"Gervase Markham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> p�se v diskusn�m pr�spevku
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Over all page rendering is good, but our UI still is sluggish on slow
machines
> > or machines with many other apps running. I would encourage our focus
of
> > Performance to be in areas that help the over all UI. naturally the why
> > mozilla works helping the UI may also help other areas also.
> >
> > Memory usage and memory leaks are also still a problem that needs to be
> > addressed. I know from reading .porkjockies that it is something that
is
> > being worked on. Again that should be an area of focus for our
Footprint
> > Performance and Stability people.
>
> I don't deny that these things will continue to be worked on; but that's a
> very different thing to saying "We require measure X of performance and
> amount Y of stability by 1.0". We could say that MTBF has to be, say, 200
> hours - but we'd just be pulling numbers out of the air.
>
> We will continue to work in these areas; however, "Mozilla should not be
> sluggish on slow machines" is not a very good 1.0 criterion.
Although I can very well understand your point, I am not sure I can agree,
as sometimess slowness simply turns out Mozilla into not practically usable
product (talking mailer mainly). Maybe it is more psychological factor, but
we should not forget it ...
Thanks,
-pekr-
>
> Gerv
