Jacek Piskozub wrote:
>
> The 4xp bugs really should have high priority. Most of the
> Mozilla/Netscape6 users will have past experience of Netscape 4x.
The problem with 4xp is that it's a very fuzzy keyword. Any HTTP bugs are
4xp because 4x did HTTP. It didn't do it 100% correctly, though (I
suspect.) So is a bug not 4xp, and therefore less high priority, simply
because 4.x coincidentally screwed up in the same way?
> However, there is one field where 4xp is not enough because the
> technology and legal framework made it possible now to include things
> that 4x cold not have. I mean cryptology. We mede some progress here,
> but not enough. Things like SSL, PGP, APOP are or will be soon required
> at many workplaces (APOP already is where I work now).
PGP is not going to make Mozilla 1.0. I don't know about APOP, but I very
much doubt there will be much feature work between now and 1.0,
particularly if it's not 4xp.
Gerv
