Ben Bucksch wrote: > That's not fair. I wanted to issue warnings, but need the allowance of > the security group, esp. its former owner, which I practically never > got. I tried, IIRC, but ended up thinking that it's futile.
Let's forget about the AOL-burdened past. I--and the Mozilla Foundation, I'm sure--want us to do the right thing now. Can we start over and give the existing policy (as written, not as executed) a try for a milestone or two? > Should I re-post the proposal (this time without listing the > 'problems')? I'd prefer the public to be able to listen and add to it, > but the security group and you as the owner in particular are the main > adressees, because we have to decide on it and implement it. Mechanically I think it'd go easier on the mailing list because trying to do it in both places will likely lead to a split thread, but if you feel strongly it needs to be public then both is fine. I think we have more of a "joe will do X, fred will do Y every Z" type of job assignment than creating new proposals, and that would work just fine on the list. -Dan Veditz _______________________________________________ Mozilla-security mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/mozilla-security
