Ian G wrote: > On Thursday 09 June 2005 02:11, Daniel Veditz wrote: >>Raising the profile of the various extensions is a great idea, that will >>speed up the feedback cycle. > > Right. Now we need someone inside Mozilla to drive this > process forward. It can't be done from outside. Someone > inside has to champion the issue - distro the info and the > proposed solutions to the various module leaders, create > the public image on the website, advise users of how to > deal with phishing, bring the key players together to craft > a policy, decide how much of Mozilla's budget to allocate > to this, let users out there know that there are solutions, > reach out and collect the experience, share it with the > solution thinkers and coders, write articles for the 'zine, > etc etc.
I disagree. There is still some work that should and can IMO be done by the larger community: * What exactly are the best of breeds extensions that should be evaluated? Ka-Ping Yee posted a list of 5 - is this the definite best of breed list? Full URLs to those? * Where are the usability/effectiveness etc. study results of those extensions? * Comments from the greater security community regarding the extensions, pros and cons * Any other things that would help in the evaluation. -- Heikki Toivonen _______________________________________________ Mozilla-security mailing list Mozilla-security@mozilla.org http://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/mozilla-security
