Heikki Toivonen wrote:
Fair enough, and I just did. However, it does not make me change my opinion, and I think my earlier points stand. I could imagine myself using petnames, but then again I am far from the average user.
Ok this is what I don't get about the current situation with Mozilla products, basically your saying that no one will ever use it, and to make sure we prove ourselves right we won't include so people will never know about it...
After all, you should realise by now it's difficult enough to get people to download and alternate browser what is the likelihood of them going on to actually get additional plugins they know nothing about?
Further more I have been having trouble connecting to the plugins website, it just sits there, it doesn't time out even when left over night for 12 hours... Tried on 2 different broadband connections + a couple of different colo connections in Australia... Yet works fine proxying via a colo in Canada...
Also I'm inclined to agree with others on the weakness of the argument about chrome space, and another reason to go with Ian's is that 10 years ago you were lucky to have 640x480 resolution, today the majority of computers, even laptops are 1024x768 or bigger.
My screen space (status bar in particular) is so far from cluttered it's not funny...
-- Best regards, Duane http://www.cacert.org - Free Security Certificates http://www.nodedb.com - Think globally, network locally http://www.sydneywireless.com - Telecommunications Freedom http://happysnapper.com.au - Sell your photos over the net! http://e164.org - Using Enum.164 to interconnect asterisk servers "I do not try to dance better than anyone else. I only try to dance better than myself." _______________________________________________ Mozilla-security mailing list [email protected] http://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/mozilla-security
