From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 6 22:15:19 2000
    ..
    To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    ..
    From: Takehiro Tominaga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
    ..
    I'm planning these features to merge the current LAME from my snapshot...
    ..
    4 many ix86 assembler routine
    ..

Takehiro,
    Many of us care little about encoder speed and are much more
concerned with encoder quality.  For us, the addition of assembler
routines just further obfuscates the code.  If you must, at least leave
the C code in place but #defined out so as to serve as the code's
specification (and as a useful check of correct functioning and as a
first step for people who want to run lame on other architectures).
    Your other, architecture-neutral changes sound good (as long as
they don't break it :-)).

Regards,
Bruce Janson, Basser Department of Computer     Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Science, F09 Madsen Building, Eastern Avenue    Phone:  +61-2-9351-3423/4
University of Sydney, N.S.W., 2006, AUSTRALIA   Fax:    +61-2-9351-3838
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )

Reply via email to