Hello, Is there use for 320kbit/s frames in JS mode? Lame -V1 -mj -h -b128 gives them regulary, and I remember someone told me that the max for each channel is 160kbit/s anyways, so there would be no quality improvement? or - are the saved bits used for bit reservoir? - to avoid switching too much between S and JS? - other reason? - possible oversight, because no reason to use JS? Sorry for the question, but Rubén Castańón got me doubting ... -- Best regards, Roel mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Encoding Live Albums archrival
- Re[2]: [MP3 ENCODER] Encoding Live Albums Roel VdB
- [MP3 ENCODER] Looking for educated guess or explan... Roel VdB
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Looking for educated guess o... Mark Taylor
- Re[2]: [MP3 ENCODER] Looking for educated ... Roel VdB
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Looking for educate... John T. Larkin
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Lame: Use for 320 JS fra... Roel VdB
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Lame: Use for 320 J... Mark Taylor
- [MP3 ENCODER] {qadjust=-2.5} to {... Roel VdB
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] {qadjust=-2... Mark Taylor
- Re[2]: [MP3 ENCODER] {qadjust... Roel VdB
- [MP3 ENCODER] A clip that cho... Roel VdB