> > Hello, > > Is there use for 320kbit/s frames in JS mode? Lame -V1 -mj -h -b128 > gives them regulary, and I remember someone told me that the max for > each channel is 160kbit/s anyways, so there would be no quality > improvement? > No such maximum. You can, for example, encode a mono file at 320kbs. Mark -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Encoding Live Albums archrival
- Re[2]: [MP3 ENCODER] Encoding Live Albums Roel VdB
- [MP3 ENCODER] Looking for educated guess or explan... Roel VdB
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Looking for educated guess o... Mark Taylor
- Re[2]: [MP3 ENCODER] Looking for educated ... Roel VdB
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Looking for educate... John T. Larkin
- [MP3 ENCODER] Lame: Use for 320 JS frames ... Roel VdB
- [MP3 ENCODER] {qadjust=-2.5} to {qadj... Mark Taylor
- [MP3 ENCODER] {qadjust=-2.5} to {... Roel VdB
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] {qadjust=-2... Mark Taylor
- Re[2]: [MP3 ENCODER] {qadjust... Roel VdB
- [MP3 ENCODER] A clip that cho... Roel VdB