> I've just been trying to help someone with re-encoding from 160/128 down
to
> 96 kbps for his portable player so I offered >-mj -b 96 --mp3input<. This
> works fine but took longer than expected (perhaps because Lame seems to
> automatically resample down to 32 kHz ?), - are these the best options
for
> optimal quality/filesize at 96 kbps ?
I would add -h
Regards,
--
Gabriel Bouvigne - France
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
icq: 12138873
MP3' Tech: www.mp3-tech.org
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
