On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 22:14:16 +0100, Jörg Krause wrote: > FYI: This is the statement of a musl maintainer about this issue: > http://www.openwall.com/lists/musl/2014/12/08/15
That is…unfortunate. Macros are basically evil and with this kind of attitude, anytime I use a standard C library, POSIX, etc. function from C++, I have to first #undef it to make sure I get the right one to be "portable" :/ . IMO, if that's the level of burden to be portable to your C library, you can keep your patches (nb. I'm not an mpd dev, so this opinion isn't binding here). Not to mention that macros have approximately zero support for usage inside of C++'s std algorithms (or C's limited selection for that matter). I'd say drop the '::' since it's a C function, not a C++ function, but that's just me. --Ben _______________________________________________ mpd-devel mailing list mpd-devel@musicpd.org http://mailman.blarg.de/listinfo/mpd-devel
