Results from Windows XP x64:
Running benchmarks
Category base
Program multiply
multiply 128 128
MPIRbench.base.multiply.128.128 result: 30694390
multiply 512 512
MPIRbench.base.multiply.512.512 result: 5965723
multiply 8192 8192
MPIRbench.base.multiply.8192.8192 result: 50089
multiply 131072 131072
MPIRbench.base.multiply.131072.131072 result: 744
multiply 2097152 2097152
MPIRbench.base.multiply.2097152.2097152 result: 27.3
MPIRbench.base.multiply result: 45085.82
Program divide
divide 8192 32
MPIRbench.base.divide.8192.32 result: 445333
divide 8192 64
MPIRbench.base.divide.8192.64 result: 455739
divide 8192 128
MPIRbench.base.divide.8192.128 result: 213045
divide 8192 4096
MPIRbench.base.divide.8192.4096 result: 80085
divide 8192 8064
MPIRbench.base.divide.8192.8064 result: 786943
divide 131072 8192
MPIRbench.base.divide.131072.8192 result: 1833
divide 131072 65536
MPIRbench.base.divide.131072.65536 result: 969
divide 8388608 4194304
MPIRbench.base.divide.8388608.4194304 result: 2.53
MPIRbench.base.divide result: 18238.82
MPIRbench.base result 28675.99
Category app
Program rsa
rsa 512
MPIRbench.app.rsa.512 result: 11816
rsa 1024
MPIRbench.app.rsa.1024 result: 2587
rsa 2048
MPIRbench.app.rsa.2048 result: 412
MPIRbench.app.rsa result: 2326.60
MPIRbench.app result 2326.60
MPIRbench result: 8168.08
CPU T7500 Core2 2.2GHz, 4GB RAM
I'll try to get the Linux results later today.
Case
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 9:28 AM, Cactus <rieman...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mar 3, 5:16 pm, Case Vanhorsen <cas...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 5:50 AM, Bill Hart <goodwillh...@googlemail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > I should add that I don't have access to Windows on Core 2 anywhere.
>> > In fact I do not know anyone who has this.
>>
>> I have access to Windows XP x64 and Linux on identical Core2 systems.
>> I can't compile on the Windows platform but I can run benchmarks if I
>> can get the compiled code.
>>
>>
>>
>> > Bill.
>>
>> > 2009/3/3 Bill Hart <goodwillh...@googlemail.com>:
>> >> I finished some work I was doing on my other project FLINT 5 days
>> >> early!! So I will spend a little time on mpir again. I'll work up some
>> >> timings for you on a core 2.
>>
>> >> Bill.
>>
>> >> 2009/3/3 Cactus <rieman...@googlemail.com>:
>>
>> >>> On Mar 3, 12:42 pm, Jeff Gilchrist <jeff.gilchr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>> On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Cactus <rieman...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> >>>> > I have added batch files in the vc9.build directory - to_gmp.bat and
>> >>>> > to_mpir.bat - for name conversion.
>>
>> >>>> Great, thanks, it seems to work well for the build.vc9 directory.
>> >>>> When you eventually convert your support for gmp-ecm and others to
>> >>>> MPIR, you will notice that it looks for "gmp.h" in the root of the
>> >>>> gmp/ directory so the batch file to convert from mpir to gmp misses
>> >>>> changing the root mpir.h to gmp.h.
>>
>> >>> Thanks, I'll fix that.
>>
>> >>>> > I have also added the new assembler code.
>>
>> >>>> I will be testing it soon.
>>
>> >>> I am confident in the AMD64 stuff. But I am NOT yet confident in the
>> >>> performance of the Core2 code.
>>
>> >>> I need x86_64 results for the Core2 code on both Windows and Linux/gcc/
>> >>> gas to know where I am with this architecture in performance terms.
>>
>> >>> Brian
>> >>> - Show quoted text -
>> >> - Show quoted text
>
> Hello Case
>
> I can send you the Windows version of mpirbench if someone else can
> supply the Linux version.
>
> It is a 250K ZIP file - is that ok? Or I could try to upload it
> here.
>
> Brian
>
> >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"mpir-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to mpir-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
