Is it my browser playing up, or do our posts seem to be be going all over the place in the threads. I start a thread called Release Candidate 1 and the discussion gets continued in the thread on Toom-4 !! Perhaps google mail doesn't sort properly by thread.
Anyhow, here are the links to the tarball, in case I posted the wrong ones (I don't see them anywhere in this thread). This is the tarball and pdf doc for release candidate 1: http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wbhart/mpir-1.0.tar.gz http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wbhart/mpir.pdf Bill. 2009/3/15 Jason Moxham <ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com>: > > On Sunday 15 March 2009 17:58:49 Bill Hart wrote: >> I haven't seen Michael online except for very basic sage maintenance >> for days. I assume he is still ill. I will be seeing him personally in >> a couple of weeks. I will ensure you get trac access. >> > > Hope he's better soon. > >> In the mean time, could you write a ticket and I will add it. I have >> no idea what re-use error in mpz_urandomm is about. I haven't been >> able to find it on the gmp website. >> >> Bill. > > Heres the original email from gmp-bugs list > > Hi, > > Section 3.4 of the manual says: > " GMP lets you use the same variable for both input and output in one > call." > > And in Section 5.13, there is no exception for mpz_urandomm(). However > the implementation (in 4.2.4, at least), does not allow the first > parameter (the result) to be the third one (the bound). See for instance > the line 72 of mpz/urandomm.c that compares n and rp, but n can be > clobbered just the line before, if it's an alias to rp. > > So I think this is a bug in the code, or in the documentation (I have no > objection to mpz_urandomm() not allowing aliases, but this should be > mentioned). > > Regards, > > Pierrick. > > I confirmed that the bug is there , and now it has been fixed. > > >> >> 2009/3/15 Jason Moxham <ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com>: >> > On Sunday 15 March 2009 17:46:31 Bill Hart wrote: >> >> Should we tar it up and call it rc1? >> > >> > Yep >> > >> >> Does make dist remove svn dirs? Does it now touch .c and .h files in >> >> demos/calc? Does it name the tarball mpir-1.0.0.tar.gz automatically? >> > >> > Yes,yes,yes >> > >> >> We should also test the c++ headers on a couple of systems to ensure >> >> we didn't break anything there. >> >> >> >> I also want to add a ticket to trac for the issue Jason Moxham fixed >> >> that was reported on the gmp list. Can you remind me what that was? >> > >> > I've still not got trac access ! >> > re-use error in mpz_urandomm , fixed , but no testcase , difficult to >> > write testcase for random stuff, re-use make it harder ! >> > >> >> Once tarred up we can do some testing to make sure that at least >> >> configure is not broken on all the SkyNet machines, and check that it >> >> builds and passes make check on a random sample of them. We should >> >> test all Core 2 and Nocona machines fully as we've changed that code >> >> again. >> >> >> >> Bill. >> >> > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mpir-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to mpir-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
