What do you guys think about changing the name back to --enable-
gmpcompat now that we actually build the library and not just provide
symlinks?
I will need to update the documentation to reflect the fact that we
build the library now, as I think it still says that we use symlinks.
I'll do this later tonight. At that point, assuming Michael finds no
more issues, I think we are right to call the resulting rc the final
version of 1.0.0. Then we can begin to look at what needs to be done
for the next release. :-)
Bill.
On Apr 6, 3:55 am, mabshoff <michael.absh...@mathematik.uni-
dortmund.de> wrote:
> On Apr 5, 7:46 pm, Jason Moxham <ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com> wrote:
>
> > On Monday 06 April 2009 03:15:46 mabshoff wrote:
>
> Hi Jason,
>
> <SNIP>
>
> > I don't understand why it works , surely we have
> > libmpir.so.3.4.1 in linux
> > libmpir.3.4.1.dylib in OSX
> > so a
> > libmpir.${shared_ext}.3.4.1
>
> > shouldn't work ?
>
> I have no idea *why* your patch works, but it does. All I can guess is
> that this is libtool magic, so I am not questioning your wisdom :)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Michael
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"mpir-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to mpir-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
