I think I prefer building the library instead of the symlink. That seems cleaner.
I'll wait for you to change this. Michael didn't get time for the final test yet either, so we'll do all that tomorrow. Bill. 2009/4/7 Jason Moxham <ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com>: > > On Tuesday 07 April 2009 23:10:09 mabshoff wrote: >> On Apr 7, 3:04 pm, Bill Hart <goodwillh...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> > What do you guys think about changing the name back to --enable- >> > gmpcompat now that we actually build the library and not just provide >> > symlinks? >> >> +1 from me. >> >> The current behavior is also consistent with the fact that gmp.h was >> never a link to mpir.h. >> > on linux its still a symlink , I can do it either way , What do we want? > >> Cheers, >> >> Michael > > Lets go for it , get the lib out the door > > >> > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mpir-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to mpir-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
