Done
On Wednesday 08 April 2009 09:30:04 Bill Hart wrote: > I think I prefer building the library instead of the symlink. That > seems cleaner. > > I'll wait for you to change this. Michael didn't get time for the > final test yet either, so we'll do all that tomorrow. > > Bill. > > 2009/4/7 Jason Moxham <ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com>: > > On Tuesday 07 April 2009 23:10:09 mabshoff wrote: > >> On Apr 7, 3:04 pm, Bill Hart <goodwillh...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >> > What do you guys think about changing the name back to --enable- > >> > gmpcompat now that we actually build the library and not just provide > >> > symlinks? > >> > >> +1 from me. > >> > >> The current behavior is also consistent with the fact that gmp.h was > >> never a link to mpir.h. > > > > on linux its still a symlink , I can do it either way , What do we want? > > > >> Cheers, > >> > >> Michael > > > > Lets go for it , get the lib out the door > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mpir-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to mpir-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
