On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:19 AM, Jason Moxham
<ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com> wrote:
> This is getting stranger , jeff1.c is or perhaps I should say supposed to be
> exactly the same same as mpir generated {dummy}32.c
>
> Can you a diff for us
This does not make any sense. You are right the only difference is
that you added /* version 1 */ to the top of jeff1.c. Even when I add
that line to dummy-278832.c making it identical it fails for that file
but not for jeff1.c.
[je...@tope mpir-1.1]$ md5sum dummy-278832.c jeff1.c
885509cb2c8cdf8904757c65718605ff dummy-278832.c
885509cb2c8cdf8904757c65718605ff jeff1.c
[je...@tope mpir-1.1]$ cc dummy-278832.s jeff1.c -o test2
jeff1.c:9: warning: return type defaults to ‘int’
jeff1.c: In function ‘main’:
jeff1.c:27: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘cpuid’
jeff1.c:42: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘strcmp’
jeff1.c:119: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘printf’
jeff1.c:119: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in
function ‘printf’
[je...@tope mpir-1.1]$ cc dummy-278832.s dummy-278832.c -o test2
dummy-278832.c:9: warning: return type defaults to ‘int’
dummy-278832.c: In function ‘main’:
dummy-278832.c:27: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘cpuid’
dummy-278832.c:42: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘strcmp’
dummy-278832.c:119: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘printf’
dummy-278832.c:119: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of
built-in function ‘printf’
/tmp/cco.v1c9C5: In function `main':
/work/jeffg/mpir-1.1/dummy-278832.c:9: multiple definition of `main'
/tmp/cco.v1c9C5:/work/jeffg/mpir-1.1/dummy-278832.c:9: first defined here
/tmp/cco.v1c9C5: In function `main':
(.text+0x5b): undefined reference to `cpuid'
/tmp/cco.v1c9C5: In function `main':
(.text+0x76): undefined reference to `cpuid'
/tmp/cco.v1c9C5: In function `main':
(.text+0x5b): undefined reference to `cpuid'
/tmp/cco.v1c9C5: In function `main':
(.text+0x76): undefined reference to `cpuid'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
Ah, I have something. For some reason if the .s file and the .c file
have the same name it fails, if they are different it works. That is
why the file from gmp and jeff1 worked because config.guess was still
using the dumy-$ value so different names. If I try:
[je...@tope mpir-1.1]$ cc jeff1.s jeff1.c -o test2
jeff1.c:9: warning: return type defaults to ‘int’
jeff1.c: In function ‘main’:
jeff1.c:27: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘cpuid’
jeff1.c:42: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘strcmp’
jeff1.c:119: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘printf’
jeff1.c:119: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in
function ‘printf’
/tmp/cco.HDcIhW: In function `main':
/work/jeffg/mpir-1.1/jeff1.c:9: multiple definition of `main'
/tmp/cco.HDcIhW:/work/jeffg/mpir-1.1/jeff1.c:9: first defined here
/tmp/cco.HDcIhW: In function `main':
(.text+0x5b): undefined reference to `cpuid'
/tmp/cco.HDcIhW: In function `main':
(.text+0x76): undefined reference to `cpuid'
/tmp/cco.HDcIhW: In function `main':
(.text+0x5b): undefined reference to `cpuid'
/tmp/cco.HDcIhW: In function `main':
(.text+0x76): undefined reference to `cpuid'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
You can see it fails. So for some reason using the same name is bad.
GMP 4.3.0 uses different names they use 0.s or 1.s and 2.c, maybe they
have encountered this problem before.
So to fix this problem you would need to change config.guess to use
something like:
dummy-278832.c
dummy-2788320.s
dummy-278864.c
dummy-2788640.s
instead of the same filename.
Jeff.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"mpir-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to mpir-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
