Here's the new config.guess As this the only part we have changed , just testing ./config.guess returns the correct cpu will be sufficient
Thanks
Jason
On Tuesday 21 April 2009 17:15:39 Jason Moxham wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 April 2009 16:04:00 Jeff Gilchrist wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:19 AM, Jason Moxham
> >
> > <ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com> wrote:
> > > This is getting stranger , jeff1.c is or perhaps I should say supposed
> > > to be exactly the same same as mpir generated {dummy}32.c
> > >
> > > Can you a diff for us
> >
> > This does not make any sense. You are right the only difference is
> > that you added /* version 1 */ to the top of jeff1.c. Even when I add
> > that line to dummy-278832.c making it identical it fails for that file
> > but not for jeff1.c.
> >
> > [je...@tope mpir-1.1]$ md5sum dummy-278832.c jeff1.c
> > 885509cb2c8cdf8904757c65718605ff dummy-278832.c
> > 885509cb2c8cdf8904757c65718605ff jeff1.c
> >
> > [je...@tope mpir-1.1]$ cc dummy-278832.s jeff1.c -o test2
> > jeff1.c:9: warning: return type defaults to ‘int’
> > jeff1.c: In function ‘main’:
> > jeff1.c:27: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘cpuid’
> > jeff1.c:42: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘strcmp’
> > jeff1.c:119: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘printf’
> > jeff1.c:119: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in
> > function ‘printf’
> >
> > [je...@tope mpir-1.1]$ cc dummy-278832.s dummy-278832.c -o test2
> > dummy-278832.c:9: warning: return type defaults to ‘int’
> > dummy-278832.c: In function ‘main’:
> > dummy-278832.c:27: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘cpuid’
> > dummy-278832.c:42: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘strcmp’
> > dummy-278832.c:119: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘printf’
> > dummy-278832.c:119: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of
> > built-in function ‘printf’
> > /tmp/cco.v1c9C5: In function `main':
> > /work/jeffg/mpir-1.1/dummy-278832.c:9: multiple definition of `main'
> > /tmp/cco.v1c9C5:/work/jeffg/mpir-1.1/dummy-278832.c:9: first defined here
> > /tmp/cco.v1c9C5: In function `main':
> > (.text+0x5b): undefined reference to `cpuid'
> > /tmp/cco.v1c9C5: In function `main':
> > (.text+0x76): undefined reference to `cpuid'
> > /tmp/cco.v1c9C5: In function `main':
> > (.text+0x5b): undefined reference to `cpuid'
> > /tmp/cco.v1c9C5: In function `main':
> > (.text+0x76): undefined reference to `cpuid'
> > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> >
> > Ah, I have something. For some reason if the .s file and the .c file
> > have the same name it fails, if they are different it works. That is
> > why the file from gmp and jeff1 worked because config.guess was still
> > using the dumy-$ value so different names. If I try:
> >
> > [je...@tope mpir-1.1]$ cc jeff1.s jeff1.c -o test2
> > jeff1.c:9: warning: return type defaults to ‘int’
> > jeff1.c: In function ‘main’:
> > jeff1.c:27: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘cpuid’
> > jeff1.c:42: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘strcmp’
> > jeff1.c:119: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘printf’
> > jeff1.c:119: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in
> > function ‘printf’
> > /tmp/cco.HDcIhW: In function `main':
> > /work/jeffg/mpir-1.1/jeff1.c:9: multiple definition of `main'
> > /tmp/cco.HDcIhW:/work/jeffg/mpir-1.1/jeff1.c:9: first defined here
> > /tmp/cco.HDcIhW: In function `main':
> > (.text+0x5b): undefined reference to `cpuid'
> > /tmp/cco.HDcIhW: In function `main':
> > (.text+0x76): undefined reference to `cpuid'
> > /tmp/cco.HDcIhW: In function `main':
> > (.text+0x5b): undefined reference to `cpuid'
> > /tmp/cco.HDcIhW: In function `main':
> > (.text+0x76): undefined reference to `cpuid'
> > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> >
> > You can see it fails. So for some reason using the same name is bad.
> > GMP 4.3.0 uses different names they use 0.s or 1.s and 2.c, maybe they
> > have encountered this problem before.
> >
> > So to fix this problem you would need to change config.guess to use
> > something like:
> >
> > dummy-278832.c
> > dummy-2788320.s
> > dummy-278864.c
> > dummy-2788640.s
> >
> > instead of the same filename.
> >
> > Jeff.
>
> Brilliant , Thanks
> What an error !!
> I think we should report this pathscale , or see if they have bug report
> allready
>
> I suspect that the cc "compiles" prog.c to prog.s and therefore overwrites
> our prog.s , and when we link them we get two mains , and an undefined
> reference to cpuid
>
> I put change in trunk and mpir-1.1 branch.
>
> Thanks
> Jason
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"mpir-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to mpir-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
config.guess
Description: application/shellscript
