Done
On Tuesday 21 April 2009 22:26:28 Bill Hart wrote:
> Could you run autoconf and automake. I've updated the version numbers
> in gmp-h.in and binary numbers in Makefile.am but when I do make dist,
> it gives me mpir-1.1.tar.gz not mpir-1.1.1.tar.gz, so I think the
> automake on sage.math isn't doing anything.
>
> Bill.
>
> 2009/4/21 Jason Moxham <ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com>:
> > All the machines on skynet that have compilers installed are OK
> >
> > We are set to go :)
> >
> > On Tuesday 21 April 2009 21:00:33 you wrote:
> >> On Tuesday 21 April 2009 17:47:23 Bill Hart wrote:
> >> > Great, so we can do 1.1.1.
> >> >
> >> > Let's do the following:
> >> >
> >> > * I'll issue a release candidate (hopefully later today).
> >> > * Jeff could you verify that the release candidate works on your
> >> > machine as expected.
> >> > * Jeff could you also check the build proceeds on Windows on the
> >> > machines you'd like to test on as we didn't do a full round of testing
> >> > for 1.1 on Windows.
> >> > * Jason and I can verify ./config.guess still returns the correct
> >> > thing on all the linux build machines on SkyNet and the other machines
> >> > we have access to.
> >>
> >> Menas fails to detect it's core2 cpu because cc is not installed
> >> This is in config.guess which is run before configure , so we can not
> >> rely on it to figure out compilers etc
> >> Actually mpir fails to build , there is no compiler.
> >>
> >> > Michael reports there were no issues with MPIR 1.1 for Sage so this
> >> > should remain true and likely MPIR 1.1.1 will end up in Sage 3,4.2 I
> >> > guess.
> >> >
> >> > * I'll do the release on the website.
> >> >
> >> > Bill.
> >> >
> >> > 2009/4/21 Jason Moxham <ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com>:
> >> > > On Tuesday 21 April 2009 16:04:00 Jeff Gilchrist wrote:
> >> > >> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:19 AM, Jason Moxham
> >> > >>
> >> > >> <ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com> wrote:
> >> > >> > This is getting stranger , jeff1.c is or perhaps I should say
> >> > >> > supposed to be exactly the same same as mpir generated
> >> > >> > {dummy}32.c
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > Can you a diff for us
> >> > >>
> >> > >> This does not make any sense. You are right the only difference is
> >> > >> that you added /* version 1 */ to the top of jeff1.c. Even when I
> >> > >> add that line to dummy-278832.c making it identical it fails for
> >> > >> that file but not for jeff1.c.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> [je...@tope mpir-1.1]$ md5sum dummy-278832.c jeff1.c
> >> > >> 885509cb2c8cdf8904757c65718605ff dummy-278832.c
> >> > >> 885509cb2c8cdf8904757c65718605ff jeff1.c
> >> > >>
> >> > >> [je...@tope mpir-1.1]$ cc dummy-278832.s jeff1.c -o test2
> >> > >> jeff1.c:9: warning: return type defaults to ‘int’
> >> > >> jeff1.c: In function ‘main’:
> >> > >> jeff1.c:27: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘cpuid’
> >> > >> jeff1.c:42: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘strcmp’
> >> > >> jeff1.c:119: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘printf’
> >> > >> jeff1.c:119: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in
> >> > >> function ‘printf’
> >> > >>
> >> > >> [je...@tope mpir-1.1]$ cc dummy-278832.s dummy-278832.c -o test2
> >> > >> dummy-278832.c:9: warning: return type defaults to ‘int’
> >> > >> dummy-278832.c: In function ‘main’:
> >> > >> dummy-278832.c:27: warning: implicit declaration of function
> >> > >> ‘cpuid’ dummy-278832.c:42: warning: implicit declaration of
> >> > >> function ‘strcmp’ dummy-278832.c:119: warning: implicit declaration
> >> > >> of function ‘printf’ dummy-278832.c:119: warning: incompatible
> >> > >> implicit declaration of built-in function ‘printf’
> >> > >> /tmp/cco.v1c9C5: In function `main':
> >> > >> /work/jeffg/mpir-1.1/dummy-278832.c:9: multiple definition of
> >> > >> `main' /tmp/cco.v1c9C5:/work/jeffg/mpir-1.1/dummy-278832.c:9: first
> >> > >> defined here /tmp/cco.v1c9C5: In function `main':
> >> > >> (.text+0x5b): undefined reference to `cpuid'
> >> > >> /tmp/cco.v1c9C5: In function `main':
> >> > >> (.text+0x76): undefined reference to `cpuid'
> >> > >> /tmp/cco.v1c9C5: In function `main':
> >> > >> (.text+0x5b): undefined reference to `cpuid'
> >> > >> /tmp/cco.v1c9C5: In function `main':
> >> > >> (.text+0x76): undefined reference to `cpuid'
> >> > >> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Ah, I have something. For some reason if the .s file and the .c
> >> > >> file have the same name it fails, if they are different it works.
> >> > >> That is why the file from gmp and jeff1 worked because
> >> > >> config.guess was still using the dumy-$ value so different names.
> >> > >> If I try:
> >> > >>
> >> > >> [je...@tope mpir-1.1]$ cc jeff1.s jeff1.c -o test2
> >> > >> jeff1.c:9: warning: return type defaults to ‘int’
> >> > >> jeff1.c: In function ‘main’:
> >> > >> jeff1.c:27: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘cpuid’
> >> > >> jeff1.c:42: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘strcmp’
> >> > >> jeff1.c:119: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘printf’
> >> > >> jeff1.c:119: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in
> >> > >> function ‘printf’
> >> > >> /tmp/cco.HDcIhW: In function `main':
> >> > >> /work/jeffg/mpir-1.1/jeff1.c:9: multiple definition of `main'
> >> > >> /tmp/cco.HDcIhW:/work/jeffg/mpir-1.1/jeff1.c:9: first defined here
> >> > >> /tmp/cco.HDcIhW: In function `main':
> >> > >> (.text+0x5b): undefined reference to `cpuid'
> >> > >> /tmp/cco.HDcIhW: In function `main':
> >> > >> (.text+0x76): undefined reference to `cpuid'
> >> > >> /tmp/cco.HDcIhW: In function `main':
> >> > >> (.text+0x5b): undefined reference to `cpuid'
> >> > >> /tmp/cco.HDcIhW: In function `main':
> >> > >> (.text+0x76): undefined reference to `cpuid'
> >> > >> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> >> > >>
> >> > >> You can see it fails. So for some reason using the same name is
> >> > >> bad. GMP 4.3.0 uses different names they use 0.s or 1.s and 2.c,
> >> > >> maybe they have encountered this problem before.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> So to fix this problem you would need to change config.guess to use
> >> > >> something like:
> >> > >>
> >> > >> dummy-278832.c
> >> > >> dummy-2788320.s
> >> > >> dummy-278864.c
> >> > >> dummy-2788640.s
> >> > >>
> >> > >> instead of the same filename.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Jeff.
> >> > >
> >> > > Brilliant , Thanks
> >> > > What an error !!
> >> > > I think we should report this pathscale , or see if they have bug
> >> > > report allready
> >> > >
> >> > > I suspect that the cc "compiles" prog.c to prog.s and therefore
> >> > > overwrites our prog.s , and when we link them we get two mains , and
> >> > > an undefined reference to cpuid
> >> > >
> >> > > I put change in trunk and mpir-1.1 branch.
> >> > >
> >> > > Thanks
> >> > > Jason
>
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"mpir-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to mpir-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
