Thanks. 2009/4/21 Jason Moxham <ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com>: > > > Done > > > On Tuesday 21 April 2009 22:26:28 Bill Hart wrote: >> Could you run autoconf and automake. I've updated the version numbers >> in gmp-h.in and binary numbers in Makefile.am but when I do make dist, >> it gives me mpir-1.1.tar.gz not mpir-1.1.1.tar.gz, so I think the >> automake on sage.math isn't doing anything. >> >> Bill. >> >> 2009/4/21 Jason Moxham <ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com>: >> > All the machines on skynet that have compilers installed are OK >> > >> > We are set to go :) >> > >> > On Tuesday 21 April 2009 21:00:33 you wrote: >> >> On Tuesday 21 April 2009 17:47:23 Bill Hart wrote: >> >> > Great, so we can do 1.1.1. >> >> > >> >> > Let's do the following: >> >> > >> >> > * I'll issue a release candidate (hopefully later today). >> >> > * Jeff could you verify that the release candidate works on your >> >> > machine as expected. >> >> > * Jeff could you also check the build proceeds on Windows on the >> >> > machines you'd like to test on as we didn't do a full round of testing >> >> > for 1.1 on Windows. >> >> > * Jason and I can verify ./config.guess still returns the correct >> >> > thing on all the linux build machines on SkyNet and the other machines >> >> > we have access to. >> >> >> >> Menas fails to detect it's core2 cpu because cc is not installed >> >> This is in config.guess which is run before configure , so we can not >> >> rely on it to figure out compilers etc >> >> Actually mpir fails to build , there is no compiler. >> >> >> >> > Michael reports there were no issues with MPIR 1.1 for Sage so this >> >> > should remain true and likely MPIR 1.1.1 will end up in Sage 3,4.2 I >> >> > guess. >> >> > >> >> > * I'll do the release on the website. >> >> > >> >> > Bill. >> >> > >> >> > 2009/4/21 Jason Moxham <ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com>: >> >> > > On Tuesday 21 April 2009 16:04:00 Jeff Gilchrist wrote: >> >> > >> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:19 AM, Jason Moxham >> >> > >> >> >> > >> <ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com> wrote: >> >> > >> > This is getting stranger , jeff1.c is or perhaps I should say >> >> > >> > supposed to be exactly the same same as mpir generated >> >> > >> > {dummy}32.c >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> > Can you a diff for us >> >> > >> >> >> > >> This does not make any sense. You are right the only difference is >> >> > >> that you added /* version 1 */ to the top of jeff1.c. Even when I >> >> > >> add that line to dummy-278832.c making it identical it fails for >> >> > >> that file but not for jeff1.c. >> >> > >> >> >> > >> [je...@tope mpir-1.1]$ md5sum dummy-278832.c jeff1.c >> >> > >> 885509cb2c8cdf8904757c65718605ff dummy-278832.c >> >> > >> 885509cb2c8cdf8904757c65718605ff jeff1.c >> >> > >> >> >> > >> [je...@tope mpir-1.1]$ cc dummy-278832.s jeff1.c -o test2 >> >> > >> jeff1.c:9: warning: return type defaults to ‘int’ >> >> > >> jeff1.c: In function ‘main’: >> >> > >> jeff1.c:27: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘cpuid’ >> >> > >> jeff1.c:42: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘strcmp’ >> >> > >> jeff1.c:119: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘printf’ >> >> > >> jeff1.c:119: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in >> >> > >> function ‘printf’ >> >> > >> >> >> > >> [je...@tope mpir-1.1]$ cc dummy-278832.s dummy-278832.c -o test2 >> >> > >> dummy-278832.c:9: warning: return type defaults to ‘int’ >> >> > >> dummy-278832.c: In function ‘main’: >> >> > >> dummy-278832.c:27: warning: implicit declaration of function >> >> > >> ‘cpuid’ dummy-278832.c:42: warning: implicit declaration of >> >> > >> function ‘strcmp’ dummy-278832.c:119: warning: implicit declaration >> >> > >> of function ‘printf’ dummy-278832.c:119: warning: incompatible >> >> > >> implicit declaration of built-in function ‘printf’ >> >> > >> /tmp/cco.v1c9C5: In function `main': >> >> > >> /work/jeffg/mpir-1.1/dummy-278832.c:9: multiple definition of >> >> > >> `main' /tmp/cco.v1c9C5:/work/jeffg/mpir-1.1/dummy-278832.c:9: first >> >> > >> defined here /tmp/cco.v1c9C5: In function `main': >> >> > >> (.text+0x5b): undefined reference to `cpuid' >> >> > >> /tmp/cco.v1c9C5: In function `main': >> >> > >> (.text+0x76): undefined reference to `cpuid' >> >> > >> /tmp/cco.v1c9C5: In function `main': >> >> > >> (.text+0x5b): undefined reference to `cpuid' >> >> > >> /tmp/cco.v1c9C5: In function `main': >> >> > >> (.text+0x76): undefined reference to `cpuid' >> >> > >> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status >> >> > >> >> >> > >> Ah, I have something. For some reason if the .s file and the .c >> >> > >> file have the same name it fails, if they are different it works. >> >> > >> That is why the file from gmp and jeff1 worked because >> >> > >> config.guess was still using the dumy-$ value so different names. >> >> > >> If I try: >> >> > >> >> >> > >> [je...@tope mpir-1.1]$ cc jeff1.s jeff1.c -o test2 >> >> > >> jeff1.c:9: warning: return type defaults to ‘int’ >> >> > >> jeff1.c: In function ‘main’: >> >> > >> jeff1.c:27: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘cpuid’ >> >> > >> jeff1.c:42: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘strcmp’ >> >> > >> jeff1.c:119: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘printf’ >> >> > >> jeff1.c:119: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in >> >> > >> function ‘printf’ >> >> > >> /tmp/cco.HDcIhW: In function `main': >> >> > >> /work/jeffg/mpir-1.1/jeff1.c:9: multiple definition of `main' >> >> > >> /tmp/cco.HDcIhW:/work/jeffg/mpir-1.1/jeff1.c:9: first defined here >> >> > >> /tmp/cco.HDcIhW: In function `main': >> >> > >> (.text+0x5b): undefined reference to `cpuid' >> >> > >> /tmp/cco.HDcIhW: In function `main': >> >> > >> (.text+0x76): undefined reference to `cpuid' >> >> > >> /tmp/cco.HDcIhW: In function `main': >> >> > >> (.text+0x5b): undefined reference to `cpuid' >> >> > >> /tmp/cco.HDcIhW: In function `main': >> >> > >> (.text+0x76): undefined reference to `cpuid' >> >> > >> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status >> >> > >> >> >> > >> You can see it fails. So for some reason using the same name is >> >> > >> bad. GMP 4.3.0 uses different names they use 0.s or 1.s and 2.c, >> >> > >> maybe they have encountered this problem before. >> >> > >> >> >> > >> So to fix this problem you would need to change config.guess to use >> >> > >> something like: >> >> > >> >> >> > >> dummy-278832.c >> >> > >> dummy-2788320.s >> >> > >> dummy-278864.c >> >> > >> dummy-2788640.s >> >> > >> >> >> > >> instead of the same filename. >> >> > >> >> >> > >> Jeff. >> >> > > >> >> > > Brilliant , Thanks >> >> > > What an error !! >> >> > > I think we should report this pathscale , or see if they have bug >> >> > > report allready >> >> > > >> >> > > I suspect that the cc "compiles" prog.c to prog.s and therefore >> >> > > overwrites our prog.s , and when we link them we get two mains , and >> >> > > an undefined reference to cpuid >> >> > > >> >> > > I put change in trunk and mpir-1.1 branch. >> >> > > >> >> > > Thanks >> >> > > Jason >> >> > > > > >
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mpir-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to mpir-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---