On Wednesday 22 April 2009 17:45:43 Bill Hart wrote: > Do you want to fix this for the release or just in trunk? If you are > sure it can't be hit in the release, no need to fix it there. >
x86_64 is OK , and pentium are definitely OK so I'll just fix it in trunk > 2009/4/22 Jason Moxham <ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com>: > > There is potential error in mul.c , the mul_2 is assumed to give the > > correct result for size=1 . mul_n and addmul_n require size>=n in general > > . We are OK because the current mul_2 for x86_64 and pentium (the only > > two cpus that have one) happen to be correct for size=1 . > > The refmpn.c also asserts size>=1 which in wrong , but try/speed all > > know different . > > > > I'll fix it tonight. > > > > Jason > > > > On Wednesday 22 April 2009 17:07:41 Jeff Gilchrist wrote: > >> Penryn cygwin just passed all test with RC2 as well. > >> > >> Jeff. > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mpir-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to mpir-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
