On Mar 18, 11:21 am, "Chris Saunders" <e...@mountaincable.net> wrote:
> I was reading the documentation on mpz_probab_prime_p. At the bottom of the
> documentation of this function it says "This function is obsolete. It will
> disappear from future MPIR releases." I have not seen the same in the GMP
> documentation for this function. Does this mean that in the future I can
> expect GMP and MPIR to be incompatable? Might I suggest that this would be
> unfortunate.
Although our general intention is to remain as compatible as possible,
GMP and MPIR will never be completely exchangeable as their are always
going to be a few functions that will exist in one but not in the
other.
For example, we will never implement the so called 'secure' functions
such as mpn_powm_sec() since we don't consider it sensible to use
either GMP or MPIR where security matters as the code is completely
inappropriate for such uses.
In the area of trial division and (probable) prime testing, there is
currently some divergence that needs careful consideration. We have
not planned a way ahead on this right now but we do see the
maintenance of a high level of GMP/MPIR compatibility as important
where the path taken by GMP makes sense.
Brian
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"mpir-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to mpir-de...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en.
