I think the unsigned long int is correct this time. I see no reason
why the remove function should return a number of bits.

Bill.

On 2 May 2011 23:42, Chris <chrisjohnsaund...@shaw.ca> wrote:
> Here is the documented API:
>
> mp_bitcnt_t mpz_remove (mpz t rop, mpz t op, mpz t f)
>
> from mpir.h:
>
> #define mpz_remove __gmpz_remove
> __GMP_DECLSPEC unsigned long int mpz_remove __GMP_PROTO ((mpz_ptr,
> mpz_srcptr, mpz_srcptr));
>
> Notice mp_bitcnt_t from the docs and unsigned long int from the header.  I'm
> working on an interface to Eiffel and need to know wether to use a 32 or 64
> bit type?
>
> Regards
> Chris Saunders
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "mpir-devel" group.
> To post to this group, send email to mpir-devel@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"mpir-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to mpir-devel@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en.

Reply via email to