I think the unsigned long int is correct this time. I see no reason why the remove function should return a number of bits.
Bill. On 2 May 2011 23:42, Chris <chrisjohnsaund...@shaw.ca> wrote: > Here is the documented API: > > mp_bitcnt_t mpz_remove (mpz t rop, mpz t op, mpz t f) > > from mpir.h: > > #define mpz_remove __gmpz_remove > __GMP_DECLSPEC unsigned long int mpz_remove __GMP_PROTO ((mpz_ptr, > mpz_srcptr, mpz_srcptr)); > > Notice mp_bitcnt_t from the docs and unsigned long int from the header. I'm > working on an interface to Eiffel and need to know wether to use a 32 or 64 > bit type? > > Regards > Chris Saunders > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "mpir-devel" group. > To post to this group, send email to mpir-devel@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mpir-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to mpir-devel@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en.