Many machines only have 2.96. The reason is because of its stability I think.
On 17 August 2011 19:38, Jason <ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com> wrote: > On Wednesday 17 August 2011 16:08:37 jason wrote: >> Hi I've removed the define >> HAVE_HOST_CPU_FAMILY_x86_64 >> as it was not used anywhere , and I plan to get rid of the other >> define HAVE_HOST_CPU_* >> >> There is one case left here >> /build.vc10/cfg.h:# define HAVE_HOST_CPU_FAMILY_x86_64 1 >> >> I assume this can be removed as well >> >> Jason > > Hi > > I plan to make the earliest version of GCC supported 3.4 , this is the > earliest version that we test on , and assuming this I can clean up some old > workarounds in the code. Any objections? > > Jason > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "mpir-devel" group. > To post to this group, send email to mpir-devel@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mpir-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to mpir-devel@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en.
