If your CIO (Chief Information Officer) recently came
back from a trip to Redmond, then forget about all the unnecessary paper work.
Either praise how great the MSMQ is (you will be assured with a promotion)
or look for a job somewhere else.
In IT industry the "reality starts where logic
ends".
Cheers
Rao
From: Miller, Dennis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 14 April 2004 12:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Microsoft MQ
Two
important questions:
1.
Does the vendor already have MSMQ infrastructure?
2.
Does the vendor require local queuing?
If
neither is true, you can easily demonstrate how WMQ client is
cheaper, easier, and better than MSMQ. I doubt the presence of WMQ
client would defeat the pretense of being all
M$.
Unless
your vendor already has a sunk MSMQ investment, the business case for MSMQ
is unfavorable. The ancillary MSMQ costs and additional support
costs almost always outweigh the cost of a WMQ license. Expressed as
"MSMQ is your choice, but either support it yourself or pay us the
additional cost to do so", conveys the situation pretty
fairly.
If
both are true, economics probably won't be the
decisive factor. Maybe it depends on which of you can first be
enticed out of your comfort zone.
This communication is confidential and may contain privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient you must not use, disclose, copy or retain it. If you have received it in error please immediately notify me by return email and delete the emails.-----Original Message-----
From: Ward, Mike S [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 9:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Microsoft MQThere is a vendor we are planning to do business with and they are an all M$ shop. The question was posed to us so now we have to deal with it.-----Original Message-----
From: Ronald Weinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 10:33 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Microsoft MQ
The usual question is
why would you want to complicate life with MSMQ if WMQ provides what you need?
"Ward, Mike S" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "MQSeries List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>04/13/2004 11:11 AM
Please respond to "MQSeries List"
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Microsoft MQ
Fellow forum members, I need your help. We are and MQSeries MQSI shop
running MQ on different platforms including Z/OS. I have been asked why we
shouldn't bring in and integrate M$ MQ. Is it possible to do this? Is there
any reason for not doing this? Has anyone out there done a study on why we
should continue with IBM and not user M$? Any help in this is highly
appreciated.
Thanks.
Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is for the intended addressee only. Any unauthorized use, dissemination of the information, or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the intended addressee, please notify the sender immediately and delete this message.
Thank you.
