Yes, and in fact looking back at my notes the QMs in question were in fact all full repositories rather than partials. Sorry for the confusion. This is what I get for drinking all that cough medicine on my way to work.
Scott -----Original Message----- From: MQSeries List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wyatt, T Rob Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 1:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Disappearing cluster queues Scott, The quote and link I provided apply specifically to *full* repositories. The idea behind that was for Tony to make absolutely sure the full repositories were in synch before trying to diagnose the partials. If the full repositories are not synchronized, there is no basis to think the partials will be. Assuming Tony gets past that part and still has a problem, then he can try the explicit channels or issue refreshes. -- T.Rob -----Original Message----- From: MQSeries List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Scott Gray Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 10:24 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Disappearing cluster queues Refer to T Robs note that quotes the manuals as saying this is a requirement. I wouldn't think it would have to work this way, but that is what the manual says and is backed up by our experience. Scott -----Original Message----- From: MQSeries List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bender, Alan Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 9:09 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Disappearing cluster queues Excuse me but if you are defining sender channels for each QM then you no longer have a true cluster but rather a distributed system and you are back to all of the admin headaches of a distributed system. I have no solution to offer but I'm sure someone at IBM has seen this and does either have a fix or a work around that doesn't include going back to a distributed system. We have had this problem with our iSeries / Windows cluster. Every time the iSeries is IPL'd we have to issue the refresh command or we begin to get the dreaded 2085 return code. Maybe it is as simple as including the refresh in a command string at startup. I don't know, just a thought. Alan -----Original Message----- From: MQSeries List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Gray Sent: Monday, September 20, 2004 8:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Disappearing cluster queues We were losing the defs on the partial repository qms. The solution for us was to define a static clussdr from a full repos to each partial repos. We had defined the cluster relying on dynamic clussdr channels from the full repos qms to the partial repos qms. That is, we had defined static clussdrs from partial to full, but allowed MQ to auto define the clussdr from full to partial based. Scott Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive
