oh and make sure to  *Deploy this boot image from the PXE service point* is
selected for both boot wims....

On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 5:45 PM, Niall Brady <any...@gmail.com> wrote:

> the error above is because you are tryiung to boot x64 uefi hardware but
> configuration manager is responding with an x86n boot wim, most likely
> because the last task sequence deployed to your OSD collection contains an
> x86 boot wim, think of LIFO, last in, first out, so if you last deployed a
> task sequence with an x86 boot wim, it'll be the first to reply, and it
> will produce that error
>
> to fix, either add your 64 uefi hardware to their own collection that HAS
> an x64 boot wim based task sequence deployed to it or deploy your x64 boot
> wim task sequence AFTER the x86 one,
>
> the end result of the latter is your other machines will pull the x64 boot
> wim down and then stage the x86,
>
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 5:33 PM, Bradley, Matt <mbrad...@quiktrip.com>
> wrote:
>
>>  Has anyone seen that show up in the SMSPXE log before?  I’m in a
>> situation where I can’t PXE boot.  Even though both the x86 and the x64
>> boot images are checked off for PXE deployment, I still get a failure.
>> Even more strange, I can create a bootable USB drive and it is boots the
>> task sequence selection just fine.
>>
>>
>>
>> This actually all started because I was getting a winload.efi error,
>> perfectly screenshot  by Niall here:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> http://www.windows-noob.com/forums/index.php?/topic/11135-why-do-i-get-a-winloadefi-status-0xc0000359-error-when-using-uefi-network-boot-in-system-center-2012-r2-configuration-manager
>>
>>
>>
>> The only difference is I indeed had both x86 and x64 checked off.  As a
>> test, I unchecked the x86, tried to PXE, it failed due to the requirement
>> both x86 and x64 be available, and then rechecked the x86 image
>> availability again, and then now I’m getting this.  I’m tired updating the
>> distribution points on both images, but I’m still stuck with nothing to
>> boot.
>>
>>
>>
>> Any ideas?
>>
>>
>



Reply via email to