> > Heh, still, your idea was fantastic in concept so I still applaud it.
>
> Blimey, Jason. This is a change from the old days. ;-)
Hey, you never gave me stunningly good ideas before {;v)
> > I'm using VC 6.0 here - I have never been able to get to grips with .NET
> for
> > various reasons so I stick to what I know I have a vague chance of
> > controlling {:v)
>
> You've been around here long enough and read the discussions, so I won't
> patronise you by telling you that MSVC7.x does native code as well as .Net
> code.
Yes - I learned that from you guys (I'm not offended by being reminded). My
problem was something I posted about almost exactly 1 month ago (but sadly
it seems no-one knew an answer) - the subject line was "VS.NET - Adding
Implementation Of Method In Interface". I am slowly starting to try and get
to grips with it, but when you need to get something coded quickly I'm
afraid fumbling around in VC7 isn't the way to go - I can only use that in
spare moments of madness when I don't have 1.1 million other things to do.
Unfortunately I started by trying to write an ATL COM (since reusable
components is clearly a good way to go), but hit one of those famous brick
walls almost immediately. I'll try again one day.
> I struggled to begin with, but the interface really is much better. The
> compiler is stricter, the compile times (in most cases are a
> little faster)
> and the optimiser is better. I'd try it and stick with it if I were you.
Oh, I am, don't worry - but as a hobby of course.
> That's good. Well, all except Microsoft going up in your estimation .;-)
Thought you might say that, that's why I didn't lavish them with too much
praise {;v)
--
Jason Teagle
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
msvc mailing list
[email protected]
See http://beginthread.com/mailman/listinfo/msvc_beginthread.com for
subscription changes, and list archive.
