>Mnemonics do not say anything about the processor type. The processor type
is
>only determined by the opcodes the processor can handle. The mnemonics are
>there only for the human programmer. I think that by the time the gameboy
was
>designed, every programmer had gotten use to Z80 style mnemonics. So why
>botter with intel style mnemonics...
Sorry, then why did they change the mnemonics in the R800?!
And I think there's enough intel programmers (maybe even more than z80
ones) to justify intel style mnemonics if what you said would be true.
No, there must be some deeper meaning to the mnemonics-style. Otherwise all
processors would use the same style mnemonics, wouldn't they?!
Patriek.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ,-. ,----. ,-. TNI on the web:
| '-.| ,-. \ '-' http://www.xs4all.nl/~newimage/
Member of | ,-'| | | | ,-.
The New Image | '--' | | '-' | Check out "MSX Banzai!" at:
since 1991 `------' '-----' http://www.xs4all.nl/~newimage/MSXBanzai!/
****
MSX Mailinglist. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
in the body (not subject) "unsubscribe msx [EMAIL PROTECTED]" (without the
quotes :-) Problems? contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] (www.stack.nl/~wiebe/mailinglist/)
****
