> One last note to the emulator writers: please do not get me wrong. I think
> that the current state of the emulators is already very good when you look at
> all problems involved in emulating hardware really good. It's only that I
> think it is better to first concentrate on getting the emulators as good as
> possible before even thinking about emulating a non-existing MSX3 system...
"Begin at the beginning", the
King said, "and go on till you
come to the end: then stop."
(Lewis Carroll)
[from BrMSX english manual]
I agree with Alex: emulator makers, do a good MSX1 emulator first.
After that, start making a MSX2 or better emulator (not that I like
emulators, but...). Everybody wants a MSX2 emulator, everybody start
writing a MSX2 emulator, but nobody can even make a good MSX1 emulator
(yes, CJS and fMSX are examples of it!).
Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Engenharia de Computacao - UNICAMP
http://www.adrpage.home.ml.org MSX-TR:I have one.And you?
* Error 547: LPT1 not found... Use backup... PENCIL & PAPER. *
****
MSX Mailinglist. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
in the body (not subject) "unsubscribe msx [EMAIL PROTECTED]" (without the
quotes :-) Problems? contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] (www.stack.nl/~wiebe/mailinglist/)
****
