Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha wrote: > Maybe better saying "assembly language"? :) Yeah, perhaps :) That's not what I originally meant, but I'm unsure if I could explain it in english. I remember when I programmed assembly for Apple II I used to call the hex dumps "machine language", and "assembly" the mnemonics for the opcodes (and, for extension, the language of the programs' sourcecodes)... =) > MSX-TR:I have one.And you? I don't. But I'd like to. `:) []s, Parn **** MSX Mailinglist. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put in the body (not subject) "unsubscribe msx [EMAIL PROTECTED]" (without the quotes :-) Problems? contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] (www.stack.nl/~wiebe/mailinglist/) ****
- Re: OPLL emulation (wa... Pablo Vasques Bravo-Villalba
- Re: OPLL emulatio... Alex Wulms
- Re: OPLL emulatio... Tristan
- Re: OPLL emulatio... Laurens Holst
- Re: OPLL emulation (wa... Tristan
- Re: OPLL emulatio... Alex Wulms
- Re: OPLL emulation (was: A... AkA DanSHakU
- Re: OPLL emulation (wa... Pablo Vasques Bravo-Villalba
- Re: OPLL emulatio... AkA DanSHakU
- Machine Language Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha
- Re: Machine Langu... Pablo Vasques Bravo-Villalba
- Re: Machine Langu... Alex Wulms
- Re: Machine Langu... Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha
- Re: OPLL emulation Maarten ter Huurne
- Re: OPLL emulation Leonard Silva de Oliveira
- Re: OPLL emulation (was: AW: &... AkA DanSHakU
- Re: OPLL emulation (was: A... Marco Antonio Simon dal Poz
- Re: OPLL emulation (wa... Alex Wulms
- Re: AW: "philosophical" view ... Maarten ter Huurne
- Re: AW: "philosophical" view ... AkA DanSHakU