Daniel Caetano wrote: > On Mon, 16 Jul 2001 16:33:26 +0200, adisak wrote: > > >Hi! > >I`m not much of a coder, but if you have trouble fitting stuff into the 32k > >kernel, why not make the next one larger than 48k ? > > the "48k" of Uzix48k name is not about kernel size. As Adriano > already said, Uzix48k will have a 64Kb kernel. 48k means that > all apps will have 48kb of linear address available, instead of > the actual 32Kb of Uzix32k. But, is the new Uzix going to be called Uzix48k? I don't like this name. I prefer simply "Uzix". The first thought that shaked my head when I saw the 48Kb was the ZX Spectrum 48Kb with rubber keys... Greets -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
- Re: UZIX is dead Marco Antonio Simon dal Poz
- Re: UZIX is dead Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha
- Re: UZIX is dead Manuel Bilderbeek
- Re: UZIX is dead Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha
- Re: UZIX is dead Manuel Bilderbeek
- Re: UZIX is dead Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha
- RE: UZIX is dead adisak
- RE: UZIX is dead Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha
- Re: UZIX is dead Manuel Bilderbeek
- RE: UZIX is dead Daniel Caetano
- Re: UZIX is dead Ivan Latorre
- Re: UZIX is dead Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha
- Re: UZIX is dead Eric Boon
- Re: UZIX is dead Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha
- Re: UZIX is dead Eric Boon
- Re: UZIX is dead Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha
- UZIX is dead Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha
- Re: UZIX is dead Patriek Lesparre
- Re: UZIX is dead Albert Beevendorp
- Re: UZIX is dead David Heremans
- Re: UZIX is dead Maarten ter Huurne