Daniel Caetano wrote:

> On Mon, 16 Jul 2001 16:33:26 +0200, adisak wrote:
>
> >Hi!
> >I`m not much of a coder, but if you have trouble fitting stuff into the 32k
> >kernel, why not make the next one larger than 48k ?
>
>   the "48k" of Uzix48k name is not about kernel size. As Adriano
> already said, Uzix48k will have a 64Kb kernel. 48k means that
> all apps will have 48kb of linear address available, instead of
> the actual 32Kb of Uzix32k.

But, is the new Uzix going to be called Uzix48k?

I don't like this name. I prefer simply "Uzix".
The first thought that shaked my head when I saw the 48Kb was the ZX Spectrum
48Kb with rubber keys...

Greets


--
For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html

Reply via email to